Scott Pelley, the signature host of CBS’s “60 Minutes,” is being called out for a lie about former President Donald Trump during a recent segment where he revisited the origins of Hunter Biden’s laptop.
Disinformation around the device has been ever-present since it was discovered by Rudy Giuliani in the back of a computer repair shop shortly before the 2020 election. Pelley on Sunday stated that Lesley Stahl, the veteran CBS journalist who was first approached about the laptop’s existence, initially did not dismiss it has a product of Russian disinformation, an allegation perpetuated by the campaign of Hillary Clinton and a nexus of former intelligence officials operating at the direction of then-advisory Anthony Blinken.
After “60 Minutes” aired its interview with Vice President Kamala Harris, Pelley explained that former President Donald Trump had refused the program’s request for equal time, “saying he needed an apology” from CBS “for its interview in 2020. Trump claims correspondent Lesley Stahl said in that interview that Hunter Biden’s controversial laptop came from Russia. She never said that.”
Within days, Trump allies unearthed portions of his 2020 interview with Stahl, whom he said “didn’t cover” the discovery of the laptop. In a clip, Stahl can be heard off-camera saying the laptop’s veracity “couldn’t be verified.”
“Of course it can be verified,” Trump pushed back. Stahl insisted that there was no way to tell whether the laptop belonged to the son of then-candidate Joe Biden, a claim that has long since been swept into the dustbin of history.
WATCH:
Following President Biden’s election, a post-mortem of the laptop’s discovery was conducted by special counsel John Durham as he probed allegations that Russians secretly delivered a laptop containing information about Hunter Biden to Giuliani, Trump’s lawyer at the time. Photos and emails emerged from the device linking Biden to his embattled son, connections that Trump’s campaign sought to exploit as he alleged the former vice president helped his son navigate thorny overseas deals while leveraging his position in the Obama administration.Durham in 2023 released a report concluding Trump and Russia had no connection going back to the 2016 campaign. As part of his investigation, Durham also uncovered that the Obama administration sought a warrant to surveil a foreign policy advisor to Trump and that no support could be found for charges made in the infamous Steele dossier alleging wrongdoing by Trump. Former British intelligence official Christopher Steele was offered $1 million by the FBI to corroborate the allegations made in the document but was unable to do so. Durham also reported that former vendors for the Hillary Clinton campaign refused to hand over documents he requested as part of his investigation.
Following the release of John Durham’s 2023 report, the media landscape was rife with renewed discussions about the Hunter Biden laptop and the credibility of the allegations surrounding it. The findings of Durham’s investigation cleared former President Donald Trump of any connections to Russian interference in both the 2016 and 2020 elections. However, the conversation surrounding Hunter Biden’s laptop continued to be a contentious topic, with many questioning how the media handled the situation during the lead-up to the 2020 election.
Scott Pelley’s remarks on 60 Minutes about the Trump-Stahl interview reignited controversy. Trump supporters quickly pointed to the 2020 interview as evidence that the media downplayed the significance of the laptop, accusing Stahl and CBS of contributing to a wider effort to dismiss the story as “Russian disinformation.” Clips from the interview show Trump repeatedly challenging Stahl on her skepticism about the laptop’s authenticity, with Stahl insisting that it “couldn’t be verified” at the time.
Critics of CBS and Pelley argue that the network’s coverage of the laptop’s discovery lacked objectivity and transparency, contributing to a broader media narrative that dismissed the story altogether. These detractors claim that, had the laptop been reported on more thoroughly at the time, it might have had a significant impact on the election.
In the wake of the controversy, calls for accountability from media outlets have grown louder, with conservative figures demanding that CBS and other news organizations issue corrections or clarifications regarding their past reporting on the Hunter Biden laptop saga. The 60 Minutes segment has become a flashpoint for broader debates about media bias and the role of journalism in shaping public perception during politically charged times.
On social media, the reaction has been split. Some see Pelley’s segment as an attempt to rewrite history in favor of the mainstream media’s original narrative, while others defend 60 Minutes for providing updates on an ongoing and complex story. The situation underscores the challenges that news organizations face in an era where public trust in media is deeply polarized.
As the 2024 election approaches, the story of Hunter Biden’s laptop continues to loom large, particularly for voters who feel that its significance was downplayed during the previous election cycle. Whether or not it will play a central role in future political discourse remains to be seen, but the fallout from the 60 Minutes segment has reignited an old debate that shows no signs of fading.
